Peter Riden
2009-06-04 00:56:47 UTC
The best comment I've seen in this group for a long while, separate to
my own of course, was this one earlier today: Nudists/Naturists need
to get over our differences as much as possible. There are big
powerful institutions out there looking to crush us in any number of
ways. We need all the support and diversity we can manage to put in
our big tent, and when we can't fit someone in our tent, we need to
support them having their own tent, and hope they support us in ours.
my own of course, was this one earlier today: Nudists/Naturists need
to get over our differences as much as possible. There are big
powerful institutions out there looking to crush us in any number of
ways. We need all the support and diversity we can manage to put in
our big tent, and when we can't fit someone in our tent, we need to
support them having their own tent, and hope they support us in ours.
believe I live up to it and have been vehemently attacked for doing
such and included in the few attackers is the very one who posted that
comment.
If you say 1 thing and do the exact opposite mostly when it comes to
repeating my words in a certain way yet attacking me for standing up
for what I believe in... it's not much going to get results from those
who still suck up to the most narrow-minded elements of society. So
Stuffy repeating my words yet going the opposite way doesn't get much
credibility, here.
But because I've been telling my few enemies to take a look at whom
they try to suck up to gain acceptance and stop attacking the more
liberally minded ones who at no time would attack any alternative
lifestyle including Nude is a social context or their own lifestyles..
yet the few enemies are the ones who ask the ultra uptight narrow
minded ones to check us out as us being the perverts, the bad ones the
dangerous ones.
I'm not talking about diverging ideas or opiniuons.
Look, Cheri that got a bit of your exasperation directed her way has
definitely more mild views of Nude Recreation than you and I Tony but
I never saw hwe attacking wither you, or myself the way I see The
Little Tribe members doing.
When I read the likes of Bill Pennington and daring talking about
disrespected posters and to no surprise "Anna" zooming on you, Tony,
as being the #1 or "He should be considered as nudism's Osama bin
Laden. He should be considered nudism's ENEMY NUMBER ONE " it brings
back the fact that their kind is more in direct line with the
conservatism and fanatism exhibited by O. B. L. and followers.
Wake up to yourselves you idiots that continue to, and constantly in
some cases, attack any nudist venue that may not be your ideal.
After a while it comes across as either a vendetta or jealousy or a
combination of both!
some cases, attack any nudist venue that may not be your ideal.
After a while it comes across as either a vendetta or jealousy or a
combination of both!
go bizzerk the way ON~Anon and any and all few members of The Little
Tribe went rabid on my venture and myself.
But what you write sums up what really animates those who go in such a
frenzy for that long against an opponent they can't defeat.
Sure - If you have a bad experience somewhere personally then you have
every right to state that, but with facts!
Stupid innuendo, and irrelevant messages, damages the posters more
than the target, as is proved daily with "annas" posts.
every right to state that, but with facts!
Stupid innuendo, and irrelevant messages, damages the posters more
than the target, as is proved daily with "annas" posts.
from there rather than being carried by "innuendos".
Have never understood the concept of making comment about a product
you've never tried yourself.
you've never tried yourself.
attacked for quite a while because they feel it represnets something
other than what they truyly are.
So if we repesnt inclusivenes and open-mindedness... then you know
what they are opposed to.
Not your cup of tea? Cool - then don't try that product! But don't
denigrate those who do - That's basic discrimination as I see it. If
it's legal, and you want it gone, then change the fucking law!
The attempted discrediting of Carolina Foothills in this thread is
another example of such bullshit, and those blindly following the
initial Cheri comment should be ashamed of themselves!- Hide quoted text -
- John answered the following
Tony....your analysis reeks with bias....certainly a club owner woulddenigrate those who do - That's basic discrimination as I see it. If
it's legal, and you want it gone, then change the fucking law!
The attempted discrediting of Carolina Foothills in this thread is
another example of such bullshit, and those blindly following the
initial Cheri comment should be ashamed of themselves!- Hide quoted text -
- John answered the following
naturally have this opinion....
to a club/resort owner who has been under attacks by some who have no
ideas of what the place or the owners are all about. They obviously
attack more for what the destination, such as TGB or Tony's
but its like we might all like walmart
but we pay for our goods and have a right to complain if things are
not satisfactory....same as a place of recreation....if things do not
suit our expectations we have a right to complain as Anna does... but
as i have told her ...the complaining tends to increase the amount of
perverts and lessen the amount of conservative clientele.....may be
this is the way society works....if hanky panky is rampant then expose
the facts and let the clientele decide for themselves...but humans are
like cattle get one to go the direction you want them to go and the
rest will follow...to be fair to the club ...Cheri should ....tell all
the facts rather than expect all to follow.....but she understands the
cattle rule i suppose.....regards...jz